INTEGRATION OF CRIMEA AND DONBASS WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION IN THE CONTEXT OF HUNTINGTON’S POLYCIVILIZATIONAL PARADIGM
https://doi.org/10.48137/2311-6412_2022_1_13
Abstract
This article analyzes the current topic of applying the civilizational approach to the study of emerging armed and political conflicts. S. Huntington’s political civilization concept considered in the context of the integration of Crimea and Donbass with the Russian Federation. The author defends the thesis that these processes are the result of the collision of two large civilizations: Orthodox and Western. The author comes to the conclusion that, proceeding from the current situation, the Russian Federation, as the “core state” of the Orthodox civilization, needs to accept the civilizational challenge that has arisen before it, aggravated around the situation in Donbass.
Keywords
About the Author
E. I. Karnaukch
Donetsk National University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
KARNAUKCH Elena I. – postgraduate student of the Department of Political Science
DPR, Donetsk, Universitetskaya str., 24
References
1. A meeting of supporters of the United Russia party took place in the DPR // URL: https://russian-center.ru/v-dnr-sostoyalsya-sletstoronnikov-partii-edinaya-rossiya/ (accessed: 09.09.2021).
2. The UN named the number of victims of the war in Donbass // URL: https://lenta.ru/news/2021/07/15/donbass/ (accessed: 09.10.2021).
3. Russian Donbass doctrine // URL: https://russian-center.ru/8315-2/ (accessed: 09.10.2021).
4. Zavrazhneva M. V. Positive consequences of the annexation of Crimea to Russia // Mechanisms of development of modern society: Collection of scientific articles based on the materials of the International correspondence scientific and practical conference / Keynes Laboratory for Applied Economic Research. M., 2014. Pp. 13–24.
5. Marmazova T. I., Fomenko M. V. The destruction of political homeostasis in Ukraine: legal aspects of the coup d’etat in 2014 // Post-Soviet continent. 2021. No. 3 (31). Pp. 4–13. DOI 10.48137 / 2311-6412_2021_3_4.
6. Naumkin V. V. The Non-Western Model: Is There a State-Civilization? // Policy. Political Studies. 2020. No. 4. Pp. 78–93.
7. Pribytkova I. M. In search of new identities: Ukraine in the ethnoregional dimension // Sociology: Theory, methods, marketing. 2001. No. 3. Pp. 60–78.
8. ProkofievS. E., TitovaA. I., Elesina M. V. SWOT analysisofthe annexationof theterritoryofCrimeatoRussia // MunicipalAcademy. 2014. No. 3. Pp. 23–33.
9. Salnikov V. I. Armed conflict in Donbass in the context of the “clash of civilizations” // Post-Soviet Studies. Vol. 4. 2021. No. 5. Pp. 359–365.
10. Ukrainians got sick of the second state // URL: https://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/news/2011/09/7/6567769/ (accessed: 09.12.2021).
11. Huntington S. Collision of civilizations. M.: AST, 2005. 603 p.
12. Fox J. Paradigm Lost: Huntington’s Unfulfilled Clash of Civilizations Prediction into the 21st Century // International Politics. 2005. No. 42. Pp. 428–457.
Review
For citations:
Karnaukch E.I. INTEGRATION OF CRIMEA AND DONBASS WITH THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION IN THE CONTEXT OF HUNTINGTON’S POLYCIVILIZATIONAL PARADIGM. Post–Soviet Continent. 2022;(1):13-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48137/2311-6412_2022_1_13
Views:
46
Email this article 