TO THE QUESTION OF REGIONAL POLITICAL REGIMES IN MODERN CONDITIONS
https://doi.org/10.48137/23116412_2022_4_43
Abstract
The article reviews various aspects of the functioning of regional political regimes in a methodological way. Emphasis is placed on the features of the modern socio-political process in conditions of instability. The variability of regime forms is shown, which, on the one hand, are gradually unified due to hybrid configurations that turned out to be not fully vital, and on the other hand, are specified in the format of neopatrimonial practices (asymmetry towards informal institutionalization), characteristic to varying degrees of all types of political regime or are considered along with the classical regime triad. In addition, the analysis concerns domestic and other post-Soviet cases in the context of national and subnational political regimes.
About the Author
G. M. Сhergeyko
State Academic University of Humanitie
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
СHERGEYKO Georgy M. – graduate student
Maronovsky Lane 26, Moscow, 119049
References
1. Dergachev A.Yu. Political regime in Russia in the post-Soviet period (regional aspect) // Theory and political problems. 2018. T. 7. № 4 A. Р. 3-8.
2. Turovsky R.F. Subnational policy: leading to the theory of views // Police: Analysis. Chronicle. Prediction (Journal of Political Philosophy and Sociology). 2014. № 4 (75). Р. 86-99.
3. Krotkov V.O. A look at Russian society and the political and political class in the post-Soviet transformation // Bulletin of Perm University. Political science. 2012. № 2 (18). Р. 42-54.
4. Alyabyeva T. Discussion model of federal development of Russia at the turn of the XX-XXI centuries // Post-Soviet mainland. 2019. № 1(21). Р. 21-53.
5. Huntington S. the Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century-Norman and London. 1991. 366 р.
6. Madatov A.S. Democratization: supernatural modern are free // Bulletin to the Russian University Friends of Peoples. Series: Political Science. 2001. № 3. Р. 45-56.
7. Levitsky S., Way L.A. The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism // Journal of Democracy. 2002. Vol. 13. № 2. Р. 51-65.
8. Rozov N.S. The theory of transformation of political regimes and the nature of neopatrimonialism // Polis. Policy studies. 2015. № 6. Р. 157-172.
9. Krotkov V.O. Genesis and features of liberal ideology in post-Soviet Russia: Dissertation for the degree of candidate of political sciences. M. 2005. 186 р.
Review
For citations:
Сhergeyko G.M. TO THE QUESTION OF REGIONAL POLITICAL REGIMES IN MODERN CONDITIONS. Post–Soviet Continent. 2022;(4):43-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48137/23116412_2022_4_43
Views:
60
Email this article 