Assessment of threats to Russia’s cultural sovereignty in the context of hybrid confrontation: the migration dimension
https://doi.org/10.48137/23116412_2026_3_22
Abstract
This article examines the transformation of Russia’s cultural sovereignty under the influence of migration processes. It establishes that the territorial concentration of migrants, in the absence of effective integration mechanisms, creates institutional conditions that, under external influence, may transition into a phase of direct threat. The study proposes a typology of scenarios for the transformation of cultural sovereignty, which enables the positioning of the current situation in Russia and facilitates the forecasting of its trajectory in response to varying institutional decisions.
About the Author
S. V. SakulinRussian Federation
Sakulin Sergei V., Research Associate, Center for Migration Studies
Moscow
References
1. Buzan B., Waever O., de Wilde J. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers. 1998.
2. Mchedlova M.M. Sek’yuritizatsiya migratsii: sotsiokul’turnaya ontologiya sovremennosti // Mezhdunarodnaya analitika. 2023. T. 14. № 3. P. 127–141. DOI: 10.46272/2587-8476-2023-14-3127-141.
3. Arkannikova M.S. Kul’turnyy suverenitet kak ideologema v mediadiskurse sovremennoy Rossii // Rossiyskaya shkola svyazey s obshchestvennost’yu. 2005. № 36. P. 84–103. DOI: 10.24412/29492513-2025-36-84-103.
4. Greenhill K.M. Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement, Coercion, and Foreign Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 2010.
5. Volokh V.A., Sandugey A.N. O protivodeystvii sozdaniyu v Rossiyskoy Federatsii anklavov i nekotorykh merakh po formirovaniyu usloviy dlya vremennogo prozhivaniya inostrannykh rabotnikov v Rossii // Vlast’. 2024. T. 32. № 1. P. 61–68.
6. Massey D.S., Arango J., Hugo G., Kouaouci A., Pellegrino A., Taylor J.E. Worlds in Motion: Understanding International Migration at the End of the Millennium. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1998.
7. Portes A. Migration, Development, and Segmented Assimilation: A Conceptual Review of the Evidence // The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2007. Vol. 610. № 1. P. 73–97.
8. Castles S. How Nation-States Respond to Immigration and Ethnic Diversity // New Community. 1995. Vol. 21. № 3. P. 293–308.
9. Bourdieu P. The Forms of Capital // Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education / Ed. by J. Richardson. New York: Greenwood Press, 1986. P. 241–258.
10. Giddens A. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press. 1984.
11. Varshaver E., Rocheva A., Ivanova N., Ermakova M. Mesta rezidentnoy kontsentratsii migrantov v rossiyskikh gorodakh: yest’ li pattern? // Sotsiologicheskoye obozreniye. 2020. T. 19. № 2. P. 225–253.
12. Mukomel’ V.I. Migratsionnaya politika i politika integratsii: sotsial’noye izmereniye // Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya. Yezhegodnik / Otv. red. M.K. Gorshkov. Vyp. 7. M.: Institut sotsiologii RAN. 2008. P. 250–272.
13. Grinchenko E.A. Sotsial’nyye riski formirovaniya etnicheskikh anklavov // Gumanitariy Yuga Rossii. 2023. № 4. P. 122–139.
Review
For citations:
Sakulin S.V. Assessment of threats to Russia’s cultural sovereignty in the context of hybrid confrontation: the migration dimension. Post–Soviet Continent. 2026;(3):22-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48137/23116412_2026_3_22
JATS XML
