PRIVATE MILITARY COMPANIES: REASONS FOR THE APPEARANCE, MAIN FEATURES AND LEGAL STATUS
https://doi.org/10.48137/23116412_2022_4_16
Abstract
The phenomenon of private military companies (PMCs) is a rather controversial and ambiguous topic. Over the past more than thirty years, PMCs have played an increasingly important role in local wars and regional conflicts. In this article we are talking about the causes of PMCs, their characteristics are analyzed and legal assessments are given. We believe that PMCs will not only not cease to exist for a long time, but, on the contrary, will spread in the future. At the same time, the activities of PMCs should be, to the maximum extent possible, within the legal framework.
About the Authors
Yu. ZHOCHAORussian Federation
ZHOCHAO Yu – PhD in Economics, Researcher
A. V. Grozin
Russian Federation
GROZIN Andrey V. – candidate of historicalSciences, head of Department of Central Asia and Kazakhstan;
senior researcher
2/1 Melnikov Ave., Khimki, Moscow region, 141410
References
1. Rebuilding Iraq: Actions Needed to Improve Use of Private Security Providers, United States Government Accountability Office, Report to Congressional Committees. July 2005. GAO-05-737. P. 8.
2. Chatterjee P. U.S.: Do Armed Contractors Belong in War Zones? // URL: http://www.ipsnews.net/2010/06/us-do-armed-contractorsbelong-in-war-zones/ (accessed: 09.07.2022).
3. Zhurbey E. The US National Security Strategy in the 90s of the XX century // Oikumena. 2015. No. 2. pp. 75-108.
4. Ilyin A. The meaninglessness of the neoliberal concept of poverty // Alternatives. 2022. No. 1 (114). pp. 150-165.
5. Fenenko A. Modern military-political concepts of the USA // International processes. 2011. Vol.9. No.1. C. 66-84.
6. Bakker C., Sossai M. Multilevel Regulation of Military and Security Contractors: The Interplay between International, European and Domestic Norms. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. 2012. 664 p.
7. Alekseeva T. «Neoliberal state» in the context of globalization // Comparative politics. 2011. No. 2. C. 44-56.
8. Popov I. Soldiers for hire // URL: https://www.forbes.ru/svoi-biznes/predprinimateli/56352-soldaty-naprokat (accessed: 06.07.2022).
9. Singer P. Corporate warriors. The Rise of the Private Military Industry, Cornell University Press. New York. 2008.
10. Zhiyar E. K. Business goes to war: private military and security companies and international humanitarian law // Journal of the Red Cross. September 2006. Vol. 88. No. 863.
11. Percy S. Regulating the private security industry: a story of regulating the last war. «Business, violence and conflict». Vol. 94. No. 887. 2012. p. 941-961.
12. Popov I. Soldiers for hire // URL: https://www.forbes.ru/svoi-biznes/predprinimateli/56352-soldaty-naprokat (accessed: 07.06.2022).
13. Crawford E., Pert A. International Humanitarian Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2015. p 301.
14. Konovalov I., Valetsky O. Evolution of private military companies. Pushkino: Center for Strategic Conjuncture. 2013. 136 p.
15. Gasser M., Malzacher M. Beyond Banning Mercenaries: The Use of Private Military and Security Companies Under IHL. International Humanitarian Law and Non-State Actors: Debates, Law and Practice (Ed. by Heffes E. et al.). The Hague: Asser Press. 2020. p 158.
16. Khubiev R. In the service of countries and corporations: impunity and the goals of American PMCs // URL: https://iarex.ru/articles/69273.html (accessed: 09.07.2022).
17. Freedman L., SmithR. TheUtility of Force: The Art of Warin the Modern World, The Polish Institute of International Affairs. Warsaw 2010. p. 363.
18. Fomichev A. The problem of private military companies // URL: https://zakon.ru/blog/2020/6/11/problema_chastnyh_voennyh_kompanij (accessed: 09.07.2022).
19. Cameron L. Private military companies: their status underinternational humanitarian law and the impact of IHL on the regulation of their activities // International Journal of the Red Cross. September 2006, vol. 88. No. 863.
Review
For citations:
ZHOCHAO Yu., Grozin A.V. PRIVATE MILITARY COMPANIES: REASONS FOR THE APPEARANCE, MAIN FEATURES AND LEGAL STATUS. Post–Soviet Continent. 2022;(4):16-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48137/23116412_2022_4_16